Renal transplant imaging and complications
Abdominal Imaging, ISSN: 0942-8925, Vol: 31, Issue: 6, Page: 735-746
2006
- 26Citations
- 35Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations26
- Citation Indexes26
- 26
- CrossRef19
- Captures35
- Readers35
- 35
Article Description
The management of end stage renal disease has been revolutionised with the advent of renal transplantation, which offers good quality of life with low morbidity. Imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis and management of complications arising in renal transplant recipients. Ultrasound, Doppler and nuclear medicine are the main imaging modalities. CT scan, MRI and angiography are used in indeterminate cases. Interventional radiology plays a vital role in the management of complications. The aim of this pictorial review is to illustrate the role and limitations of imaging in renal transplant. The normal appearances, the spectrum of pathological conditions affecting the transplant and the complications of immunosuppression are discussed and illustrated. © 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=34248137963&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-006-9091-2; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17318682; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00261-006-9091-2; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-006-9091-2; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00261-006-9091-2; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00261-006-9091-2; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00261-006-9091-2
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know