Evaluating the inflammatory activity in Crohn’s disease using magnetic resonance diffusion kurtosis imaging
Abdominal Radiology, ISSN: 2366-0058, Vol: 44, Issue: 8, Page: 2679-2688
2019
- 3Citations
- 17Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- Captures17
- Readers17
- 17
Article Description
Objectives: To explore the feasibility of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) for evaluating inflammatory activity in Crohn’s disease (CD). Materials and methods: In all, 51 CD patients were included, who were performed with consecutive enteroscopy, MR and DKI (b values = 0–2000 mm/s). The lesions of bowel segments were graded as inactive (0–2), mild (3–6), and moderate–severe group (> 6) based on simplified endoscopic activity score for Crohn’s disease (SES-CD), The abilities of the parameters of DKI and DWI in grading different activity lesions were compared. Results: One hundred and twenty-seven bowel segments including inactive (15), mild (45) and moderate–severe (67) were analyzed. ADC (r = − 0.627, p < 0.001), D (r = − 0.381, p < 0.001) and K (r = 0.641, p < 0.001) were correlated with SES-CD. These parameters were significantly different among the three groups (all p < 0.001). ROC analysis found ADC had the highest accuracy (AUC = 0.884, p < 0.001) to differentiate inactive from active group with the threshold at 0.865 × 10 mm/s, which was slightly higher than K (AUC = 0.867, p < 0.001) with the threshold at 0.645, and was obviously higher than D (AUC = 0.726, p = 0.005). Similarly, ADC also had the highest accuracy (AUC = 0.846, p < 0.001) to differentiate inactive–mild from moderate–severe group with the threshold at 0.825 × 10 mm/s, and minimally higher than K (AUC = 0.843, p < 0.001) with the threshold at 0.695, and obviously higher than D (AUC = 0.690, p < 0.001). Conclusion: DKI is feasible and comparable to conventional DWI for the evaluation of inflammatory activity in CD.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85065980638&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02013-3; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31093729; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00261-019-02013-3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02013-3; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00261-019-02013-3
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know