M-Shaped Auricular Cartilage Grafts for Correcting Short Nose Deformity in Asians: A Retrospective Study

Background: The demand for rhinoplasty in Asia is growing annually, and short nose deformity has been one of the main reasons for the surgery due to its high incidence. There is an urgent need for rhinoplasty suitable for Asians because of their different facial features from Westerners. The M-shaped auricular cartilage rhinoplasty has been developed as a new method for correcting short nose deformity for Asians. This study aimed to evaluate the aesthetic and functional results of M-shaped auricular cartilage rhinoplasty compared to clinically commonly used rhinoplasty methods. Methods: A total of 45 patients were enrolled and divided into three groups of 15 patients: The first group underwent M-shaped auricular cartilage rhinoplasty, the second group underwent auricular-septal cartilage rhinoplasty, and the third group underwent overlapped auricular cartilage rhinoplasty. All of these patients underwent comprehensive rhinoplasty and had silicone or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene implants in the dorsum of their noses. Results: The patient score improvements on the three patient-reported outcome measures were higher in the M-shaped auricular cartilage rhinoplasty group (1.65/1.79/0.11) compared with the overlapped auricular cartilage rhinoplasty group (1.40/1.51/0.05), and the score improvements in the auricular-septal cartilage rhinoplasty group (2.04/1.98/0.28) were the highest. Conclusions: This is a retrospective clinical study demonstrating the clinical efficacy of M-shaped auricular cartilage rhinoplasty. Compared with the overlapped auricular cartilage rhinoplasty, the effect of this novel M-shaped method is better. However, when compared to the auricular-septal cartilage rhinoplasty with septal extension and reinforcement using nasal septal cartilage, its effect is slightly worse. Level of Evidence IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.