Molecular tumor boards – insights and perspectives
Pathologe, ISSN: 0172-8113, Vol: 42, Issue: 4, Page: 357-362
2021
- 1Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
The rapid development of molecular technologies and targeted therapies has fostered the implementation of specialized tumor conferences, known as molecular tumor boards (MTBs). MTBs become particularly important when treatment recommendations are needed based on molecular alterations beyond the approved targeted therapies. While an MTB’s goals are based on individualized diagnostics and therapies of tumor patients using innovative technologies and biomarkers, the procedures of MTBs are still quite heterogeneous. This applies to the primary inclusion criteria for tumor patients, the composition of MTBs, the applied diagnostic tests and their assessment and reporting, the evaluation of their clinical value and implementation in a therapeutic strategy, and the associated quality assurance measurements as well as knowledge-gaining, economical, legal, and ethical aspects. This article provides an overview of the spectrum of MTBs, their challenges, and the potential for individualized cancer medicine.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85108845769&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00292-021-00955-4; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34170386; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00292-021-00955-4; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00292-021-00955-4; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00292-021-00955-4
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know