Prevalence and variables associated with solitary pulmonary nodules in a routine clinic-based population: A cross-sectional study
European Radiology, ISSN: 1432-1084, Vol: 24, Issue: 9, Page: 2174-2182
2014
- 23Citations
- 38Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations23
- Citation Indexes23
- 23
- CrossRef8
- Captures38
- Readers38
- 38
Article Description
Objective: To determine the prevalence of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) in chest radiology studies and patient's features associated with malignancy in a non-high-risk clinical population. Methods: Patients ≥35 years were referred for thoracic imaging in two hospitals (2010-2011). Eight radiologists determined the presence and characteristics of SPN. Selected variables were collected from radiological register and medical records. Observer agreement in the diagnosis of SPN was assessed. Results: 25,529 patients were included: 23,102 (90.5 %) underwent chest radiograph and 2,497 (9.5 %) a CT. The prevalence of SPN was 2.1 % (95 % CI 1.9 - 2.3) in radiographs and 17.0 % (95 % CI 15.5 - 18.5) in CT. In patients undergoing chest radiograph, detection of SPN with an irregular border was more frequent among smokers. In patients who had a CT, larger SPNs appeared to be associated with 60 years of age or over, diagnosis of a respiratory illness, or male gender. In addition, an irregular border was also more common among men. Conclusions: The prevalence of SPNs detected by both radiograph and CT was lower than that shown in screening studies. Patient characteristics such as age, sex, respiratory disease, or smoking habit were associated with nodule characteristics that are known to be related with malignancy. Key Points: • There is a lower SPN prevalence in the clinical population than in screening studies. • SPN prevalence is associated with some patient characteristics: sex, age, imaging test. • Nodule characteristics related to malignancy were associated with some patient characteristics. © 2014 The Author(s).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84905922625&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3249-z; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24962823; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00330-014-3249-z; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3249-z; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00330-014-3249-z
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know