PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Assessment of the relationship between morphological emphysema phenotype and corresponding pulmonary perfusion pattern on a segmental level

European Radiology, ISSN: 1432-1084, Vol: 25, Issue: 1, Page: 72-80
2015
  • 14
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 22
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Article Description

Purpose: Distinct morphological emphysema phenotypes were assessed by CT to show characteristic perfusion defect patterns. Material/Methods: Forty-one patients with severe emphysema (GOLD III/IV) underwent three-dimensional high resolution computed tomography (3D-HRCT) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion. 3D-HRCT data was visually analyzed for emphysema phenotyping and quantification by consensus of three experts in chest-radiology. The predominant phenotype per segment was categorized as normal, centrilobular, panlobular or paraseptal. Segmental lung perfusion was visually analyzed using six patterns of pulmonary perfusion (1-normal; 2-mild homogeneous reduction in perfusion; 3-heterogeneous perfusion without focal defects; 4-heterogeneous perfusion with focal defects; 5-heterogeneous absence of perfusion; 6-homogeneous absence of perfusion), with the extent of the defect given as a percentage. Results: 730 segments were evaluated. CT categorized 566 (78 %) as centrilobular, 159 (22 %) as panlobular and 5 (<1 %) as paraseptal with no normals. Scores with regards to MR perfusion patterns were: 1–0; 2–0; 3–28 (4 %); 4–425 (58 %); 5–169 (23 %); 6–108 (15 %). The predominant perfusion pattern matched as follows: 70 % centrilobular emphysema - heterogeneous perfusion with focal defects (score 4); 42 % panlobular - homogeneous absence of perfusion (score 5); and 43 % panlobular - heterogeneous absence of perfusion (score 6). Conclusion: MR pulmonary perfusion patterns correlate with the CT phenotype at a segmental level in patients with severe emphysema.

Bibliographic Details

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know