Flow rate models in renal obstruction
World Journal of Urology, ISSN: 1433-8726, Vol: 29, Issue: 1, Page: 109-114
2011
- 1Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
- Captures6
- Readers6
Article Description
Background: In acute unilateral renal obstruction, calculated divided renal uptake following injection of tracer may be normal. Divided renal function as measured by uptake may be insensitive to fall in renal plasma flow (RPF) to the obstructed kidney. This study analyses afferent flow rate parameters of optimised models of renogram time activity curves (TAC). Afferent flow rate parameters may have differing sensitivity to altered RPF from divided renal tracer uptake and may be more sensitive to changes in cortical function in renal obstruction. Method: Twenty-four background-corrected renogram TACs using Tc-labelled mercapto-acetyl-triglycine (MAG3) with a unilateral obstructive pattern and six normal control renograms TACs were studied. Optimised computed models of each curve were constructed using specialised software (ModelMaker, Cherwell Scientific) and using the Marquardt Least Squares method. Following optimisation to the TAC of each target renogram, the afferent flow rate parameters were calculated. Results: Following optimisation of models, afferent flow rate parameters, expressed as arbitrary units, (mean 0.15, SD 0.06) in acutely obstructed kidneys, were typically reduced in comparison with those of normal kidneys (mean 0.44, SD 0.04). (Paired t test; P < 0.005). By contrast, this reduction in afferent flow rate parameter was greater than the reduction in differential tracer uptake for the obstructed kidney (divided renal function of the obstructed group; mean 0.3, SD 0.14 compared with the control group; mean 0.45, SD 0.05 (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Optimised modelling of TACs of obstructed renograms is feasible and may provide a more sensitive index of parenchymal dysfunction in early obstruction than comparing divided renal tracer uptake. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=78751643433&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-010-0569-8; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20512341; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00345-010-0569-8; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-010-0569-8; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00345-010-0569-8; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00345-010-0569-8; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00345-010-0569-8
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know