Nitrous oxide emission from an irrigated cotton field under semiarid subtropical conditions
Biology and Fertility of Soils, ISSN: 0178-2762, Vol: 44, Issue: 5, Page: 773-781
2008
- 21Citations
- 30Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In a 1-year study, quantification of nitrous oxide (NO) emission was made from a flood-irrigated cotton field fertilized with urea at 100kg N ha a. Measurements were made during the cotton-growing season (May-November) and the fallow period (December-April). Of the total 95 sampling dates, 77 showed positive NO fluxes (range, 0.1 to 33.3g N ha d), whereas negative fluxes (i.e., NO sink activity) were recorded on 18 occasions (range, -0.1 to -2.2g N ha d). Nitrous oxide sink activity was more frequently observed during the growing season (15 out of 57 sampling dates) as compared to the fallow period (3 out of 38 sampling dates). During the growing season, contribution of NO to the denitrification gaseous N products was much less (average, 4%) as compared to that during the fallow period (average, 21%). Nitrous oxide emission integrated over the 6-month growing period amounted 324g N ha, whereas the corresponding figure for the 6-month fallow period was 648g N ha. Subtracting the N O sink activity (30.3g N ha and 3.8g N ha during the growing season and fallow period, respectively), the net N O emission amounted 938g N ha a. Results suggested that high soil moisture and temperature prevailing under flood-irrigated cotton in the Central Punjab region of Pakistan though favor high denitrification rates, but are also conducive to NO reduction thus leading to relatively low NO emission. © 2008 Springer-Verlag.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=43349083055&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00374-008-0276-4; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00374-008-0276-4; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00374-008-0276-4; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00374-008-0276-4.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00374-008-0276-4/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00374-008-0276-4; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00374-008-0276-4; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00374-008-0276-4; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00374-008-0276-4
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know