PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

The evaluation of rectal mucosal punch biopsy in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease: a 30-year experience of 954 patients

Pediatric Surgery International, ISSN: 1437-9813, Vol: 33, Issue: 2, Page: 173-179
2017
  • 10
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 24
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Article Description

Purpose: For 30 years, we have consecutively performed rectal mucosal punch biopsy to diagnose Hirschsprung’s disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of our technique. Methods: Patients with suspected Hirschsprung’s disease who underwent punch biopsy, including our original “K-PUNCH” method using an S-moid forceps and non-specific blood-collecting tube at our department and branch hospital between April 1986 and March 2016 were included in the present study. Our punch biopsy technique is characterized by excellent visibility and a direct grasping sensation. The backgrounds and complications of the patients were retrospectively investigated. Results: During this period, 954 patients (median age 4 months; range 1 day–73 years) underwent punch biopsy. Although there were no cases of severe complications (i.e., rectal perforation, infection or full-thickness biopsy), one (0.1%) of the 954 cases in the early period showed liver dysfunction and required transfusion due to bleeding. In addition, inappropriate specimens were obtained in 37 patients (3.9%). Conclusion: Punch biopsy including the “K-PUNCH” method is considered safe and feasible and is associated with a low rate of complications and inappropriate specimen harvesting among patients of all ages. Comorbidities, including the potential for hemorrhage, should always be considered.

Bibliographic Details

Yoshimaru, Koichiro; Kinoshita, Yoshiaki; Yanagi, Yusuke; Obata, Satoshi; Jimbo, Takahiro; Iwanaka, Tsuyoshi; Takahashi, Yoshiaki; Esumi, Genshiro; Miyata, Junko A; Matsuura, Toshiharu; Izaki, Tomoko; Taguchi, Tomoaki

Springer Nature

Medicine

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know