Young patients with benign anal diseases and rectal bleeding: should a colonoscopy be performed?
International Journal of Colorectal Disease, ISSN: 1432-1262, Vol: 34, Issue: 12, Page: 2069-2073
2019
- 6Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations6
- Citation Indexes6
- CrossRef1
- Captures16
- Readers16
- 16
Article Description
Background and aim: There is no consensus whether a colonoscopy should be recommended for patients under 50 years of age who present with both anal bleeding and benign anal diseases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of colonoscopy to detect neoplastic lesions in this specific group of patients. Methods: A prospective study analyzing the results of colonoscopies performed in patients younger than 50 years of age who reported a rectal bleeding and also had a diagnosis of benign anal disease at first clinical visit. Results: One hundred and eighty-seven consecutive patients were prospectively included in this study. In 35 patients (18.7%), adenomatous polyps were diagnosed. Thirty-seven percent of those lesions (13 cases) were further classified as either advanced adenomas or serrated adenomas. The prevalence of adenomas was 14.6% among patients under the age of 40 and 20% among those between 40 and 50 years of age. Thirty-one percent of the adenomas (11 cases) were located in the right colon, without any other concomitant lesion in the distal colon. In addition, an unsuspected case of sigmoid carcinoma was diagnosed. Conclusion: The performance of colonoscopy in young patients with benign anal diseases and hematochezia resulted in a high rate of detection of neoplastic lesions. The method might be considered as a valid strategy of investigation in this frequent clinical situation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85074870572&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-019-03425-9; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31707558; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00384-019-03425-9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-019-03425-9; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00384-019-03425-9
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know