New biologics and orally available compounds: What is still in the pipeline?
Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, ISSN: 0340-1855, Vol: 69, Issue: 7, Page: 626-632
2010
- 1Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
- Captures5
- Readers5
Review Description
Biologics have revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory joint disease in the last decade. By precisely targeting and inhibiting inflammatory cytokines as well as the blockade of cells centrally integrated in the immune system, inhibition of inflammation has become possible which had been unthinkable before. The medical need to improve our current approach with biologics even more is based on three observations: (1) even though the clinical effect of a given biologic is evident in the majority of patients, not all show a satisfactory response, (2) the blockade of important mediators of the immune system bears the risk of infection and potentially malignant events and (3) all current biologics need to be administered parenterally. The present review describes several innovative biologics and low molecular weight compounds which are currently being investigated in clinical trials in patients suffering from inflammatory rheumatic conditions. Some of them may become a part of our growing armamentarium to treat these diseases which still represent a major burden to the patients and society. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77957834818&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00393-009-0531-6; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20725732; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00393-009-0531-6; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00393-009-0531-6; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00393-009-0531-6; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00393-009-0531-6; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00393-009-0531-6
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know