Limits of outpatient rheumatology care
Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, ISSN: 1435-1250, Vol: 80, Issue: 9, Page: 846-854
2021
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Review Description
Background: In recent years outpatient rheumatology has developed into one of the most important pillars of rheumatological care. The better diagnostic possibilities, the well-founded training of rheumatologists and the diverse guidelines have led to increasingly more patients being diagnosed as outpatients and can be treated by the most modern options as outpatients. Nevertheless, limits have also been set for outpatient rheumatology. Objective: This article aims to highlight what the limits of outpatient rheumatology currently are and who sets the limits. The presentation of the limitations should help all participants in the healthcare system to avoid false expectations and frustration; however, limits can also be relocated or overcome by appropriate motivation. The long-term target should be a further improvement in the interaction between outpatient and inpatient rheumatology and therefore the rheumatological care of patients. Results and discussion: The medical limits of outpatient rheumatology are relatively clear and predominantly uncontroversial, the unjustified referral to the inpatient section is, for example, relatively rarely a problem. Some theoretically possible outpatient interventions are carried out in the inpatient sector more due to logistical problems. The healthcare political and legal limitations of outpatient rheumatological institutions are greater. Despite further limitations of outpatient rheumatology this discipline and the outpatient activity still represents an exciting, modern and last but not least a very satisfying activity, which is promoted here.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85116243049&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00393-021-01089-x; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34605978; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00393-021-01089-x; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00393-021-01089-x; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00393-021-01089-x
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know