MUnCH: a calculator for propagating statistical and other sources of error in passive microrheology
Rheologica Acta, ISSN: 1435-1528, Vol: 61, Issue: 1, Page: 49-57
2022
- 3Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
A complete propagation of error procedure for passive microrheology is illustrated using synthetic data from generalized Brownian dynamics. Moreover, measurement errors typical of bead tracking done with laser interferometry are employed. We use the blocking transformation method of Flyvbjerg and Petersen (J Chem Phys 91(1):461–466 1989) applicable to estimating statistical uncertainty in autocorrelations for any time series data, to account properly for the correlation in the bead position data. These contributions to uncertainty in correlations have previously been neglected when calculating the error in the mean-squared displacement of the probe bead (MSD). The uncertainty in the MSD can be underestimated by a factor of about 20 if the correlation in the bead position data is neglected. Using the generalized Stokes-Einstein relation, the uncertainty in the MSD is then propagated to the dynamic modulus. Uncertainties in the bead radius and the trap stiffness are also taken into account. A simple code used to aid in the calculations is provided.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know