Timing of intrauterine insemination: An attempt to unravel the enigma
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, ISSN: 0932-0067, Vol: 284, Issue: 4, Page: 1023-1027
2011
- 22Citations
- 39Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations22
- Citation Indexes21
- 21
- CrossRef10
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures39
- Readers39
- 39
Article Description
Introduction Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with intrauterine insemination (IUI) is an eVective treatment in cases of cervical factor, unexplained infertility and mild male factor. The optimal timing of IUI after human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) after COS with clomiphene citrate is debatable and may be a factor limiting success of same. This study was designed to scientiWcally determine if variation in the timing of IUI could aVect the cycle outcome. Materials and methods In a prospective randomized trial couples with mild male factor, unexplained infertility and mild endometriosis who underwent COS with IUI were recruited. COS was achieved with clomiphene citrate. Two hundred and four women underwent 461 cycles of IUI. Women were randomized to two groups: group I (104 patients, 231 cycles) had IUI 36 h after hCG, while group II (100 patients, 230 cycles) had IUI 24 h after hCG. Primary outcome included pregnancy rate per couple and per cycle. Results Fifty-four patients had pregnancy with and pregnancy rate per couple and per cycle were 32.6 and 14.7% in group I and 20 and 8.6% in group II, respectively (not statistically diVerent). Conclusions Altering timing of IUI after COS does not enhance pregnancy rates. IUI 36 h after hCG has marginally better pregnancy rates than 24 h. Timing of insemination may be kept at 24 or 36 h after hCG injection to suit the convenience of the clinic or care provider. The lack of statistical signiWcance indicates need for larger studies to draw guidelines. © Springer-Verlag 2010.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84855730870&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1950-6; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21710180; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00404-011-1950-6; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00404-011-1950-6; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00404-011-1950-6; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1950-6; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-011-1950-6
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know