Sham-controlled implantation after preimplantation genetic screening by polar body biopsy and FISH
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, ISSN: 0932-0067, Vol: 289, Issue: 2, Page: 439-444
2014
- 3Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Purpose: Preimplantation genetic screening wants to improve artificial reproductive technologies, primarily by raising the rates of pregnancy, implantation and birth. We investigated if embryos derived from oocytes detected euploid for five chromosomes implant better than those which were biopsied but where the genetic detection failed. They were nevertheless transferred, thus serving as a sham control. Method: From 2004 to 2008 we performed 104 cycles of PGS with laser biopsy of the first polar body and FISH with five chromosomes. It was offered to all patients with eight or more oocytes, free of charge. The average female age was 36 years. If no euploid oocytes were available, not detected oocytes were transferred. Result: In 104 cycles 99 embryo transfers (95 %) were performed, resulting in 28 pregnancies (27 %), 20 births (71 %) and 8 miscarriages (29 %). The implantation rate in the euploid group was 19 vs. 13 % in the not detected group (n.s.). This trend was the same independent of age and embryo morphology. Conclusion: The pregnancy rate does not differ significantly from the national average. The trend in better implantation rates of euploid oocytes justifies a continuation of studies in this matter. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84895192851&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2945-2; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23856937; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00404-013-2945-2; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2945-2; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-013-2945-2
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know