Placenta accreta and balloon catheterization: the experience of a single center and an update of latest evidence of literature
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, ISSN: 1432-0711, Vol: 298, Issue: 1, Page: 83-88
2018
- 25Citations
- 35Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations25
- Citation Indexes25
- 25
- CrossRef3
- Captures35
- Readers35
- 35
Article Description
Purpose: We studied the efficacy of using pre-cesarean delivery (CD) temporary occlusion of internal iliac arteries with balloon catheters in case of placenta previa–accreta in terms of maternal and neonatal outcomes and to test accuracy of ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for prenatal diagnosis. Methods: From March 2014 to January 2018, women with an US and/or MRI diagnosis of placenta previa–accreta and a planned delivery were enrolled and divided into two groups: balloon catheterization group (women treated with preoperative catheters and CD) and control group (women candidates to elective CD). Results: 37 patients were enrolled: 16 in balloon catheterization group and 21 in control group. Significant differences were detected in estimated blood loss. Prophylactic balloon catheterization could reduce intraoperative red blood cell transfusion. The incidence of hysterectomy was lower in balloon group. No statistical difference was found for neonatal outcomes. Both US and MRI have showed to be useful and complementary to diagnose placenta previa–accreta. Conclusions: Temporal, perioperative, and prophylactic positioning of balloon vascular catheters is an effective method for managing severe hemorrhage caused by placenta previa–accreta as it reduced intraoperative blood loss, lessened perioperative hemostatic measures and intraoperative red cell transfusions, and reduced hysterectomies.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85047138137&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4780-y; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29777345; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00404-018-4780-y; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4780-y; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-018-4780-y
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know