Cumulative live birth rates over multiple complete cycles of in vitro fertilisation cycles: 10-year cohort study of 20,687 women following freeze-all strategy from one single centre
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, ISSN: 1432-0711, Vol: 305, Issue: 1, Page: 251-259
2022
- 2Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- Captures6
- Readers6
Article Description
Purpose: To explore the cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) over multiple complete cycles of in vitro fertilization (IVF) among patients following freeze-all strategy Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed among 20,687 women undergoing their first and following IVF cycles from 2007 to 2016. The main outcomes of present study were live birth rate per cycle, conservative CLBR and optimal CLBR. Results: The CLBR increased from 50.74% for the first complete cycle to 64.41% for the conservative estimate and 84.77% for the optimal estimate after seven complete cycles. The CLBRs varied by age. The conservative estimate of CLBR after five complete cycles declined from 77.11% for women younger than 31 years, to 8.63% for women older than 40 years. The optimal CLBRs were 91.82% and 13.74%, respectively. The predictors of live birth over multiple complete cycles for patients embarking on IVF following freeze-all strategy were women’s age and causes of infertility. For patients finishing the first complete cycle, the number of oocytes retrieved at complete cycle one also played an important predictive role. Conclusions: Among women undergoing IVF following freeze-all strategy, the CLBR after seven complete IVF cycles was 84.77% if there were not barriers to continue the IVF treatment, with variation by age. Two prediction models were developed to estimate their probability of having a baby over multiple complete IVF cycles with freeze-all strategy among patients before starting IVF and patients after the first complete cycle, which is critical for patients to make treatment decisions and preparations physically, emotionally, and financially.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85111755191&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06063-1; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34350510; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00404-021-06063-1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06063-1; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-021-06063-1
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know