Frequency of cul-de-sac obliteration in surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective analysis
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, ISSN: 1432-0711, Vol: 309, Issue: 6, Page: 2931-2935
2024
- 16Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures16
- Readers16
- 16
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Data on Gastroenterology Discussed by Researchers at Odawara Municipal Hospital (Frequency of Cul-de-sac Obliteration In Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: a Retrospective Analysis)
2024 APR 26 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Japan Daily Report -- Current study results on Gastroenterology have been published. According
Article Description
Introduction and hypothesis: We aimed to clarify the frequency of cul-de-sac obliteration in patients undergoing POP surgery. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent laparoscopic POP surgery at our hospital between April 2017 and September 2021. Results: In total, 191 cases were included in the analysis. Ten patients (5.2%) had cul-de-sac obliteration. No difference in age (73 years vs. 72 years, P = 0.99), parity (2 vs. 2, P = 0.64), or body mass index (BMI) (25.7 kg/m vs. 24.7 kg/m, P = 0.34) was observed between the cul-de-sac obliteration and normal groups. No significant differences were observed in the rate of previous abdominal surgery (50.0% vs. 32.6%, P = 0.46), rate of POP – quantification system (POP-Q) ≥ 2 posterior prolapse (40.0% vs. 46.4%, P = 0.98), and effect of defecation symptoms on the prolapse quality of life (p-QOL) score (vaginal bulge emptying bowels: 2.5 vs. 3.5, P = 0.15; empty bowel feeling: 3 vs. 3, P = 0.72, constipation: 3.5 vs. 3, P = 0.58; straining to open bowels: 3.5 vs. 3, P = 0.82; empty bowels with fingers: 1 vs. 1, P = 0.55) between the cul-de-sac obliteration and normal groups. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for the cul-de-sac obliteration was performed for age, number of births, previous abdominal surgery, and presence of rectocele; however no significant risk factors were extracted. Conclusion: Predicting cul-de-sac obliteration preoperatively in patients undergoing POP surgery based on age, number of previous surgeries, previous abdominal surgeries, rectocele, and defecation symptoms is difficult.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85189625561&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07476-4; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38584245; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00404-024-07476-4; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07476-4; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-024-07476-4
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know