PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Frequency of cul-de-sac obliteration in surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective analysis

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, ISSN: 1432-0711, Vol: 309, Issue: 6, Page: 2931-2935
2024
  • 0
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 16
    Captures
  • 1
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Captures
    16
  • Mentions
    1
    • News Mentions
      1
      • 1

Most Recent News

Data on Gastroenterology Discussed by Researchers at Odawara Municipal Hospital (Frequency of Cul-de-sac Obliteration In Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: a Retrospective Analysis)

2024 APR 26 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Japan Daily Report -- Current study results on Gastroenterology have been published. According

Article Description

Introduction and hypothesis: We aimed to clarify the frequency of cul-de-sac obliteration in patients undergoing POP surgery. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent laparoscopic POP surgery at our hospital between April 2017 and September 2021. Results: In total, 191 cases were included in the analysis. Ten patients (5.2%) had cul-de-sac obliteration. No difference in age (73 years vs. 72 years, P = 0.99), parity (2 vs. 2, P = 0.64), or body mass index (BMI) (25.7 kg/m vs. 24.7 kg/m, P = 0.34) was observed between the cul-de-sac obliteration and normal groups. No significant differences were observed in the rate of previous abdominal surgery (50.0% vs. 32.6%, P = 0.46), rate of POP – quantification system (POP-Q) ≥ 2 posterior prolapse (40.0% vs. 46.4%, P = 0.98), and effect of defecation symptoms on the prolapse quality of life (p-QOL) score (vaginal bulge emptying bowels: 2.5 vs. 3.5, P = 0.15; empty bowel feeling: 3 vs. 3, P = 0.72, constipation: 3.5 vs. 3, P = 0.58; straining to open bowels: 3.5 vs. 3, P = 0.82; empty bowels with fingers: 1 vs. 1, P = 0.55) between the cul-de-sac obliteration and normal groups. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for the cul-de-sac obliteration was performed for age, number of births, previous abdominal surgery, and presence of rectocele; however no significant risk factors were extracted. Conclusion: Predicting cul-de-sac obliteration preoperatively in patients undergoing POP surgery based on age, number of previous surgeries, previous abdominal surgeries, rectocele, and defecation symptoms is difficult.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know