Measurement of mucociliary clearance in the patients with multiple sclerosis
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, ISSN: 1434-4726, Vol: 277, Issue: 2, Page: 469-473
2020
- 6Citations
- 12Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent Blog
Smelling in MS, Is your nose running slow?
Yep you get it all here folks, top science, neuros waxing lyrical and the down-right daft. So when I saw this little gem, I couldn’t help but write about it. I learn something every day. Hope you do. Whilst we see if ProfG does his monday morning post or maybe he is off somewhere nice. He pops up to Sheffield to do teaching every now and then and its good that he gets to visit “Gods own Country“,
Article Description
Objectives: The aim of the present study was to measure nasal mucociliary clearance (NMC) time in the patients with MS and to compare the findings with healthy population. Methods: Totally 97 individuals including 47 patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis and 50 healthy volunteers were enrolled into the study. Saccharin clearance test was performed on both groups and NMC time was measured. Data analysis was performed by SPSS version 24.0 statistics program (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Statistical tests were interpreted at p < 0.05 significance level. Results: The NMC time averages in MS patients and healthy control group were 12.43 ± 4.05 min and 8.14 ± 2.87 min, respectively; the difference between the groups was significant (p < 0.001). There was a statistically strong association between NMC time values and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) values in MS patients (r = 0.817, p < 0.001). Conclusion: We found nasal mucociliary transport time longer in MS patients than healthy population in the present study. To the best of our knowledge, there is not any study conducted about this topic in the literature. We believe that our findings would shed a light on further studies.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85075164184&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05717-w; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31707467; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00405-019-05717-w; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05717-w; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00405-019-05717-w
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know