The influence of Slim Modiolar electrode on residual hearing in pediatric patients
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, ISSN: 1434-4726, Vol: 278, Issue: 8, Page: 2723-2732
2021
- 8Citations
- 18Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- Captures18
- Readers18
- 18
Article Description
Purpose: Hearing preservation cochlear implantation is an established procedure in patients with low-frequency residual hearing, especially in pediatric cochlear implantation. More delicate, thin electrode arrays can minimize damage in the inner ear and enhance the possibility for residual hearing preservation. The Cochlear CI532 electrode has been reported as an electrode with the potential for residual hearing preservation. No similar studies pertaining to hearing preservation in pediatric patients have appeared to date. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the Cochlear CI532 Slim Modiolar electrode allows the preservation of low-frequency residual hearing in children undergoing cochlear implantation. Methods: In this multicenter, nonrandomized, prospective clinical cohort study, medical data of 14 pediatric patients implanted with the CI532 were collected. All patients had residual low-frequency hearing (preoperative audiogram or ABR with at least one threshold better than 90 dB HL at 125, 250, 500, or 1000 Hz). Postoperative thresholds were obtained 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after cochlear implantation. Results: Based on the HEARRING classification, 78.6% of children (11/14) had complete hearing preservation at the last follow-up visit (12 months after CI, or if not available, 6 months). A total of 21.4% (3/14) had partial hearing preservation. At the last follow-up visit, neither minimal hearing preservation nor loss of hearing was observed. Functional low-frequency hearing was preserved in 13 out of 14 patients (93%). Conclusions: The residual hearing preservation results in children were superior to the results previously reported in adults.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85090462650&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06342-8; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32897440; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00405-020-06342-8; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06342-8; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00405-020-06342-8
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know