Endoscopic tympanoplasty type I for tympanic perforations: analysis of prognostic factors
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, ISSN: 1434-4726, Vol: 278, Issue: 12, Page: 4715-4722
2021
- 10Citations
- 22Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- Captures22
- Readers22
- 22
Article Description
Purpose: To assess the anatomical and functional outcomes of endoscopic transcanal tympanoplasty type I for tympanic membrane perforations. Methods: Eight hundred thirty-five patients who underwent tympanoplasty between January 2011 and January 2019 were selected. Patients with tympanic membrane perforation treated with a transcanal endoscopic tympanoplasty type 1 and a follow-up period longer than 6 months have been retrospectively reviewed. The presence of cholesteatoma or ossicular chain dysfunctions were considered exclusion criteria. Eighty-one patients were included in the present study population. The main outcome was the rate of overall graft success. Secondary outcomes included hearing results. Prognostic factors related to both the abovementioned outcomes were assessed. Results: Overall, 66 patients (81.5%) had a successful graft at the last follow-up evaluation. Mean follow-up was 22.1 (range 6–104) months. The anterior quadrants were entailed by the perforation in 62 (76.5%) cases. The overall success rate with cartilage (or cartilage and perichondrium) was 91.2% (p < 0.01). The median preoperative and postoperative ABG were 18.7 (13.4–25.6) and 7.5 (2.5–12.5), respectively, revealing a significant median improvement of 11.2 (p < 0.001). The type of graft and the postoperative tympanic membrane status were significantly associated with the audiologic outcome with p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively. Conclusions: Endoscopic tympanoplasty type I is a reliable technique with reasonable anatomic and audiologic results. Tympanic membrane grafting with cartilage (or cartilage and perichondrium) guarantees a higher rate of perforation closure and satisfactory hearing results. Anterior eardrum perforations can be successfully and safely managed with transcanal endoscopic approach avoiding postauricular approach and canalplasty.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85099198807&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06588-2; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33438041; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00405-020-06588-2; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06588-2; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00405-020-06588-2
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know