Negative symptoms in first episode schizophrenia: treatment response across the 2-year follow-up of the “Parma Early Psychosis” program
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, ISSN: 1433-8491, Vol: 272, Issue: 4, Page: 621-632
2022
- 12Citations
- 27Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes11
- 11
- CrossRef1
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures27
- Readers27
- 27
Article Description
Negative symptoms (NS) severely interfere with real-world performance, already at the onset of schizophrenia and in “clinical high risk” mental states. However, most of the empirical studies specifically examining treatment effectiveness on NS included patients with stable, prolonged schizophrenia. Moreover, research on psychosocial interventions for NS in early schizophrenia is still relatively scarce. Thus, the aims of this study were (1) to longitudinally monitor the NS stability in young individuals with First Episode Schizophrenia (FES) across a 2-year follow-up period, and (2) to investigate any significant association of NS with functioning, other aspects of FES psychopathology and the specific treatment component effects on NS of an “Early Intervention in Psychosis” (EIP) program during the 2 years of follow-up. At entry, 159 FES participants (aged 12–35 years) completed the Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Spearman’s correlations and multiple linear regression analyses were performed. NS had relevant enduring associations with PANSS disorganization scores and GAF functioning decline. Across the follow-up, FES individuals showed a significant improvement in NS levels. This was specifically associated with the number of individual psychotherapy and intensive case management sessions provided during the 2 years of our EIP program, as well as with the antipsychotic dosage at entry. NS are clinically relevant in FES, already at the enrollment in specialized EIP services. However, their clinical severity seems to decrease over time, together with the delivery of specific, patient-tailored EIP interventions.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85123955833&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00406-021-01374-5; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35088121; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00406-021-01374-5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00406-021-01374-5; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00406-021-01374-5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know