Value of impedance cardiography in patients studied for pulmonary hypertension
Lung, ISSN: 0341-2040, Vol: 189, Issue: 5, Page: 369-375
2011
- 42Citations
- 35Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations42
- Citation Indexes42
- 42
- CrossRef22
- Captures35
- Readers35
- 35
Article Description
The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and precision of impedance cardiography as a method for noninvasive hemodynamic evaluation of patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). We performed a prospective and blinded study of patients who underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) for evaluation of known or presumed PH at the University of Florida from August 2009 to March 2010. The cohort consisted of a total of 39 patients (age = 57±14 years, 87% women) with presumed (23%) or confirmed PH (77%) of different etiologies. Patients underwent RHC and impedance cardiography using the PhysioFlow PF-05. The PhysioFlow PF-05 measures cardiac output (CO) and LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), among other parameters. The median pulmonary artery pressure was 36 (IQR 26-56) mmHg. The CO (mean±SD) by thermodilution (CO-T) and by impedance cardiography (CO-IC) was 5.9±2.2 and 5.6±1.5 L/min, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis of CO-T versus CO-IC revealed a mean of 0.3 L/min (95% LoA: -2.2 to ?2.8). In patients with PH, the correlation of CO-T and CO-IC had a mean of 0.4 L/min (95% LoA: 2.9 and -2.2). Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) correlated with LVEDV (R = 0.2, p = 0.005). By ROC analysis, EDV≥200 ml had a sensitivity of 53% and a specificity of 86% for PAOP[15 mmHg (AUC = 0.78). In patients with PH, impedance cardiography had good accuracy and fair precision for CO determination when compared with thermodilution. Impedance cardiography may provide information about the preload status and has the potential to become a cost-effective and noninvasive method for the follow-up of patients with PH. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80755140164&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00408-011-9299-y; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21604215; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00408-011-9299-y; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00408-011-9299-y; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00408-011-9299-y; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00408-011-9299-y; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00408-011-9299-y
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know