Chromosome aberration analysis and the influence of mitotic delay after simulated partial-body exposure with high doses of sparsely and densely ionising radiation
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, ISSN: 0301-634X, Vol: 45, Issue: 1, Page: 45-54
2006
- 19Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations19
- Citation Indexes19
- 19
- CrossRef10
- Captures10
- Readers10
- 10
Article Description
The influence of high doses of sparsely and densely ionising radiation on the yield of aberrant human peripheral lymphocytes in simulated partial-body exposures was studied by investigating radiation-induced chromosome aberration frequencies, namely dicentric and centric ring chromosomes. Peripheral blood samples from two volunteers were irradiated with high doses of 200 kV X-rays or neutrons with a mean energy of =2.1 MeV and partial-body exposure was simulated by mixing irradiated and non-irradiated blood from the same two donors in proportions of 25, 50, and 75%. Lymphocytes were cultured and first-division metaphase cells were collected after culture times of 48, 56, and 72 h. A significant underrepresentation of dicentric and centric ring chromosomes was observed at the three highest doses of X-rays between the different culture times for nearly all proportions. After neutron irradiation, some significant differences were observed at all doses and all culture times, without however, revealing any systematic pattern. The distribution of dicentric and ring chromosomes showed overdispersion for both radiation types. After simulated partial-body exposures with 200 kV X-rays and =2.1 MeV neutrons, strong mitotic delays could be observed, which depended on both the irradiated volume and the applied dose: the smaller the irradiated volume and the higher the dose, the higher was the selective advantage of non-irradiated cells. For the purpose of biological dosimetry after partial body exposure, an extension of the lymphocyte culture time is suggested at least for doses ≥3.0 Gy of 200 kV X-rays and ≥0.5 Gy of =2.1 MeV neutrons in order to prevent a systematic underestimation of cytogenetic damage. © Springer-Verlag 2006.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33746771431&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00411-006-0036-5; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16565842; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00411-006-0036-5; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00411-006-0036-5; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00411-006-0036-5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00411-006-0036-5; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00411-006-0036-5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know