Multiple sclerosis and inflammatory bowel diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Journal of Neurology, ISSN: 1432-1459, Vol: 264, Issue: 2, Page: 254-259
2017
- 86Citations
- 125Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations86
- Citation Indexes85
- 85
- CrossRef4
- Patent Family Citations1
- 1
- Captures125
- Readers125
- 125
Article Description
The association between multiple sclerosis (MS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been suggested, apart from their common epidemiological and immunological patterns, also due to observations of increased incidence of both IBD among MS patients and MS among IBD patients. We estimated the risk of concurrent IBD and MS comorbidity, using data from all available case–control studies. We calculated the corresponding Risk ratios (RRs) in each included case–control study to express the risk of IBD and MS concurrence at a given population. We performed additional subgroup analyses according to the type of registry from which the data of the cases were exported (IBD or MS registry) and the IBD type (Crohn’s disease, CD or Ulcerative colitis, UC). We included 10 studies, comprising a total of 1,086,430 patients (0.08% of them with concurrent IBD and MS). Pooled RR for IBD/MS comorbitity was 1.54 (95% CI 1.40–1.67; p < 0.0001) with no differences (p = 0.91) among IBD and MS registries (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.36–1.72, p < 0.001 for MS comorbidity in IBD patients vs. RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.32–1.81, p < 0.001 for IBD comorbidity in MS patients). No difference was also found on the risk of MS comorbidity among patients with CD or UC (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.34–1.72, p < 0.001 vs. RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.38–1.74, p < 0.001; p for subgroup differences: 0.84). In all analyses no evidence of heterogeneity or publication bias was detected. Both IBD and MS patients seem to have a fifty-percent increased risk of MS or IBD comorbidity, respectively, with no apparent differences between patients with CD or UC.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84996479885&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-016-8340-8; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27878439; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00415-016-8340-8; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-016-8340-8; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00415-016-8340-8
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know