Epidemiology of pediatric multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica, and optic neuritis in Taiwan
Journal of Neurology, ISSN: 1432-1459, Vol: 267, Issue: 4, Page: 925-932
2020
- 9Citations
- 43Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef2
- Captures43
- Readers43
- 43
Article Description
Background and objective: The epidemiology of pediatric acquired demyelinating disorders remains to be clarified in many parts of Asia. We carry out this study to depict the epidemiology of pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica (NMO), and optic neuritis (ON) in Taiwan. Methods: We conducted a retrospective nationwide population-based study using data from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database. Prevalent cases of pediatric MS and NMO during 2001–2015, and incident cases of pediatric MS, NMO, and ON during 2003–2015 were identified. The demographic features and comorbidities were investigated. Results: We identified 403 MS, 42 NMO, and 1496 ON incident cases under the age of 20 during 2003–2015. The majority of pediatric MS (86.1%) and NMO (90.5%) patients were 10 years old or above. The incidence of MS and ON was relatively steady, while that of NMO increased prominently later during the study period. The average incidence of pediatric MS and NMO during 2011–2015 was 0.52 and 0.11 per 100,000 person-years, respectively. The female preponderance was evident for pediatric MS and NMO, and less so for pediatric ON. The most common autoimmune comorbidities for pediatric MS were thyrotoxicosis (1.0%) and systemic lupus erythematosus (0.7%). Conclusion: The epidemiology of pediatric MS was largely stationary in Taiwan during 2001–2015, while the prevalence of pediatric NMO rose steeply during this period, probably reflecting better recognition of this clinical entity. Autoimmune comorbidities were uncommon for pediatric MS and NMO in Taiwan.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85075645727&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09647-9; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31781928; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00415-019-09647-9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09647-9; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00415-019-09647-9
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know