Optimizing intraocular lens power calculation using adjusted conventional keratometry for cataract surgery combined with Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, ISSN: 1435-702X, Vol: 260, Issue: 9, Page: 3087-3093
2022
- 5Citations
- 18Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- Captures18
- Readers18
- 18
- Mentions2
- News Mentions2
- 2
Most Recent News
Recent Findings in Cataract Surgery Described by Researchers from University of Munster (Optimizing Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using Adjusted Conventional Keratometry for Cataract Surgery Combined With Descemet Membrane Endothelial ...)
2023 OCT 30 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at NewsRx Medical Devices Daily -- A new study on Surgery - Cataract Surgery
Article Description
Purpose: To evaluate the utility of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation using adjusted conventional keratometry (K) according to postoperative posterior to preoperative anterior corneal curvature radii (PPPA) ratio for eyes with Fuch’s dystrophy undergoing cataract surgery combined with Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (triple DMEK). Methods: A fictitious refractive index (FRI) was determined (Pentacam HR®) based on the PPPA ratio in 50 eyes undergoing triple DMEK. Adjusted corneal power was calculated in every eye using adjusted K values: K values determined by the IOLMaster were converted to adjusted anterior corneal radius using the mean FRI. Posterior corneal radius was calculated using the mean PPPA ratio. Adjusted corneal power was determined based on the calculated corneal radii and thick lens formula. Refractive errors calculated using the Haigis, SRK/T, and HofferQ formulae based on the adjusted corneal power were compared with those based on conventional K measurements. Results: Calculated PPPA ratio and FRI were 0.801 and 1.3271. Mean prediction error based on conventional K was in the hyperopic direction (Haigis: 0.84D; SRK/T: 0.74D; HofferQ: 0.74D) and significantly higher (P < 0.001) than that based on adjusted corneal power (0.18D, 0.22D, and 15D, respectively). When calculated according to adjusted corneal power, the percentage of eyes with a hyperopic shift > 0.5D fell significantly from 64 to 30% (Haigis), 62 to 36% (SRK/T), and 58 to 26% (HofferQ), respectively. Conclusion: IOL power calculation based on adjusted corneal power can be used to reduce the risk of a hyperopic shift after triple DMEK and provides a more accurate refractive outcome than IOL power calculation using conventional K.[Figure not available: see fulltext.]
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85126102219&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05598-6; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35258717; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00417-022-05598-6; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05598-6; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00417-022-05598-6
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know