Combined musculoskeletal pain in the upper and lower body: associations with occupational mechanical and psychosocial exposures
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, ISSN: 0340-0131, Vol: 88, Issue: 8, Page: 1099-1110
2015
- 23Citations
- 43Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations23
- Citation Indexes22
- 22
- CrossRef15
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures43
- Readers43
- 43
Article Description
Purpose: Pain in more than one site is common in working populations. We aimed to characterise combined pain (pain in the upper and lower body) and to evaluate whether the prevalence of combined pain is positively related to combined occupational mechanical exposures to the upper and lower body and to high psychosocial job strain. Methods: This cross-sectional study was based on questionnaire data from the Musculoskeletal Research Database at the Danish Ramazzini Centre. The study included 14,081 men and 20,173 women. Occupational exposures were assessed by job exposure matrices. We analysed the prevalence of pain limited to the upper body, pain limited to the lower body, and combined pain in relation to occupational exposures using Poisson regression. Results: During the last year, 23.2 % of the men and 33.9 % of the women reported combined pain, which was characterised by somatisation, illness worrying, and low SF-36 scores. For men, the adjusted prevalence ratio for combined pain was 1.51 [95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) 1.40–1.64] in relation to exposures limited to the upper body and 2.24 (95 % CI 2.11–2.39) in relation to combined exposures. For women, the corresponding adjusted prevalence ratios were 1.56 (95 % CI 1.50–1.63) and 1.55 (95 % CI 1.50–1.61). High job strain was related to pain among men, only. Conclusion: Combined pain may in part be explained by local effects of occupational mechanical exposures acting at more than one site.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84945435195&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-015-1036-z; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25731853; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00420-015-1036-z; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-015-1036-z; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00420-015-1036-z
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know