Spinal and corticospinal pathways are differently modulated when standing at the bottom and the top of a three-step staircase in young and older adults
European Journal of Applied Physiology, ISSN: 1439-6319, Vol: 117, Issue: 6, Page: 1165-1174
2017
- 7Citations
- 35Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes7
- CrossRef7
- Captures35
- Readers35
- 35
Article Description
Purpose: This study investigated the modulation of spinal (group Ia afferents) and corticospinal pathways when young (22.7 ± 1.3 years) and older adults (72.2 ± 7.9 years) stood at the bottom and at the top of a three-step staircase equipped with force platforms. Method: Changes in submaximal H-reflex amplitude (H) and slope of the H-reflex input–output relation (spinal pathway), and in amplitude of motor-evoked potentials (MEP) triggered by transcranial magnetic stimulation (corticospinal pathway) at two intensities (1.1× and 1.2× motor threshold) were recorded in soleus when subjects stood as steady as possible downstairs and upstairs. The centre of pressure (CoP) excursion was analyzed in the time and frequency domains in both conditions. Results: Regardless of age, the mean CoP velocity was greater when standing upstairs (11.1 ± 3.5 mm s) than downstairs (9.0 ± 2.3 mm s; p = 0.002). The CoP power spectral density (PSD) in the 0–0.5 Hz band was greater upstairs than downstairs (+18.4%; p = 0.03) whereas PSD in the 2–20Hz frequency band was lesser (−41%) upstairs than downstairs (p < 0.001), regardless of age. In both groups, the H amplitude (−30.6%; p < 0.001) and slope of H-reflex input–output relation (−10.2%; p = 0.002) were lesser when standing upstairs than downstairs, whereas no significant difference was observed in MEP amplitude and silent period between balance conditions (p > 0.05). Conclusion: These results indicate a lower dependence on spinal pathway to control soleus motor neurones when standing upstairs than downstairs accompanied by a change in postural control. This suggests that healthy older adults preserved their ability to adjust postural control to environmental demands.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85017472826&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-017-3603-3; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28409395; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00421-017-3603-3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-017-3603-3; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00421-017-3603-3
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know