Transmission of stimulus-locked responses in two oscillators with bistable coupling
Biological Cybernetics, ISSN: 0340-1200, Vol: 91, Issue: 4, Page: 203-211
2004
- 10Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef9
- Captures15
- Readers15
- 15
Article Description
Numerous electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) studies aim at identifying the chronological order of activation of brain areas. This paper demonstrates that the timing sequence obtained with the gold standard for EEG/MEG analysis (averaging across trials) may not correlate at all with the actual transmission of a stimulus' effect within a pathway formed by connected brain areas. This is shown by studying transmission of stimulus-locked responses in a model that shares basic features with stimulated neuronal rhythms: in two phase oscillators with bistable coupling and noise one oscillator is stimulated. The model presents a mechanism that causes a response clustering, i.e., a switching between two different responses across trials, without extinction of the averaged response (calculated over all trials). Transmission times are calculated for all trials as well as for the two clusters separately with standard averaged responses and with a stochastic phase resetting analysis. The stochastic phase resetting analysis provides reliable estimates of the transmission time. In contrast, transmission times calculated by averaging across trials correspond to the phase difference in the different stable synchronized states (when calculated for the two clusters separately) or their weighted superposition (when calculated over all trials). The standard method does not detect the time elapsing during the transmission of the stimulus' action. The results presented here call into question many findings reported in the evoked response literature.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=10044257907&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00422-004-0512-4; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15378377; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00422-004-0512-4; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00422-004-0512-4; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00422-004-0512-4; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00422-004-0512-4; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00422-004-0512-4
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know