Short internal pancreatic stent reduces pancreatic fistula in pancreatoduodenectomy
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, ISSN: 1435-2451, Vol: 406, Issue: 3, Page: 721-728
2021
- 8Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- CrossRef1
- Captures14
- Readers14
- 14
Article Description
Background: Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) is a major complication of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). A pancreatic stent is usually used for drainage of the pancreatic duct, but the best type of the stent remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate perioperative factors and their influence on the risk of CR-POPF following PD. Methods: From 2006 to 2019, the records of 246 patients who underwent PD were retrospectively reviewed, and the relationship between perioperative factors including type of pancreatic stent and CR-POPF was investigated. External or internal pancreatic stents were used for drainage of the pancreatic duct, and the internal stent was inserted 1 cm into the jejunum to decrease stent obstruction. Results: External and internal pancreatic stents were used in 137 and 109 patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the diameter of the main pancreatic duct (odds ratio = 0.292, 95% confidence interval = 0.140–0.605, P = 0.001), diagnosis (odds ratio = 3.359, 95% confidence interval = 1.498–7.693, P = 0.003), and type of pancreatic stent (odds ratio = 0.435, 95% confidence interval = 0.203–0.934, P = 0.033) were independent factors related to CR-POPF after PD. Internal stent was associated with a low rate of CR-POPF (P < 0.001) and short postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.001) compared to external stent. Conclusion: A short pancreatic internal stent could decrease the incidence of CR-POPF.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85096334627&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-02036-1; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33225380; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00423-020-02036-1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-02036-1; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00423-020-02036-1
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know