The tetrodotoxin-resistant Na channel Nav 1.8 reduces the potency of local anesthetics in blocking C-fiber nociceptors
Pflugers Archiv European Journal of Physiology, ISSN: 0031-6768, Vol: 459, Issue: 5, Page: 751-763
2010
- 18Citations
- 40Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations18
- Citation Indexes18
- CrossRef18
- 18
- Captures40
- Readers40
- 40
Article Description
The generation of action potentials in nociceptive neurons is accomplished by the tetrodotoxin-resistant (TTXr) Na channel Na1.8. Following nerve injury, a redistribution of Na1.8 from dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons into peripheral axons contributes to hyperexcitability and possibly to neuropathic pain. Na1.8 has been reported to display a lower sensitivity to block by Na channel blockers as compared to TTX-sensitive (TTXs) Na subunits. Furthermore, the antinociceptive efficacy of lidocaine is increased in Na1.8-knockout mice. Here, we asked if Na1.8 expression can reduce the susceptibility of sensory neurons to block by lidocaine. Employing wildtype and Na1.8-knockout mice, we examined C-fibers in the skin-nerve preparation and Na currents in DRG neurons by patch-clamp recordings. Deletion of Na1.8 resulted in an enhanced tonic block of Na currents in DRG neurons held at -80 mV but not at -140 mV Accordingly, lower concentrations of lidocaine were required for a conduction block of C-fibers from Na1.8- knockout as compared to wild-type mice. The efficacy of lidocaine on neurons lacking Na1.8 was further increased by cold temperatures, due to a synergistic hyperpolarizing shift of the slow inactivation of TTXs Na channels by lidocaine and cooling. Finally, the ∼90% reduction of TTXr Na currents in injured neurons from mice with a peripheral nerve injury was accompanied with an enhanced tonic block by lidocaine. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that the expression of Na1.8 in sensory neurons can confine the antinociceptive efficacy of lidocaine and other Na channel blockers employed for pain treatment.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77950953931&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00424-010-0785-5; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20174994; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00424-010-0785-5; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00424-010-0785-5; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00424-010-0785-5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00424-010-0785-5; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00424-010-0785-5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know