Volumetric 3D reconstruction of plant leaf cells using SEM, ion milling, TEM, and serial sectioning
Planta, ISSN: 1432-2048, Vol: 255, Issue: 6, Page: 118
2022
- 4Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations4
- Citation Indexes4
- Captures6
- Readers6
Article Description
Main conclusion: Focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy is well suited for volumetric extractions and 3D reconstructions of plant cells and its organelles. Abstract: The three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of individual plant cells is an important tool to extract volumetric data of organelles and is necessary to fully understand ultrastructural changes and adaptations of plants to their environment. Methods such as the 3D reconstruction of cells based on light microscopical images often lack the resolution necessary to clearly reconstruct all cell compartments within a cell. The 3D reconstruction of cells through serial sectioning transmission electron microscopy (ssTEM) and focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) are powerful alternatives but not widely used in plant sciences. Here, we present a method for the 3D reconstruction and volumetric extraction of plant cells based on FIB milling and compare the results with 3D reconstructions obtained with ssTEM. When compared to 3D reconstruction based on ssTEM, FIB-SEM delivered similar results. The data extracted in this study demonstrated that tobacco cells were larger (31410 µm) than pumpkin cells (20697 µm) and contained more chloroplasts (175 vs. 124), mitochondria (1317 vs. 291) and peroxisomes (745 vs. 79). While individual chloroplasts, mitochondria, peroxisomes were larger in pumpkin plants (25, 53, and 50%, respectively) they covered more total volume in tobacco plants (5390, 395, 374 µm, respectively) due to their higher number per cell when compared to pumpkin plants (4762, 134, 59 µm, respectively). While image acquisition with FIB-SEM was automated, software controlled, and less difficult than ssTEM, FIB milling was slower and sections could not be revised or re-imaged as they were destroyed by the ion beam. Nevertheless, the results in this study demonstrated that both, FIB-SEM and ssTEM, are powerful tools for the 3D reconstruction of and volumetric extraction from plant cells and that there were large differences in size, number, and organelle composition between pumpkin and tobacco cells.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85129668615&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00425-022-03905-3; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35522384; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00425-022-03905-3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00425-022-03905-3; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00425-022-03905-3
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know