Neonatal point-of-care lung ultrasound: what should be known and done out of the NICU?
European Journal of Pediatrics, ISSN: 1432-1076, Vol: 183, Issue: 4, Page: 1555-1565
2024
- 2Citations
- 16Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- Captures16
- Readers16
- 16
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Reports Summarize Pediatrics Study Results from Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (Neonatal Point-of-care Lung Ultrasound: What Should Be Known and Done Out of the Nicu?)
2024 MAR 04 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Pediatrics Daily News -- Investigators discuss new findings in Pediatrics. According to news
Review Description
Lung ultrasound is rapidly becoming a useful tool in the care of neonates: its ease of use, reproducibility, low cost, and negligible side effects make it a very suitable tool for the respiratory care of all neonates. This technique has been extensively studied by different approaches in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), both for diagnostic and prognostic aims and to guide respiratory treatments. However, many neonates are being born in level I/II hospitals without NICU facilities so all pediatricians, not just neonatal intensivists, should be aware of its potential. This is made possible by the increasing access to ultrasound machines in a modern hospital setting. In this review, we describe the ultrasonographic characteristics of the normal neonatal lung. We also discuss the ultrasound features of main neonatal respiratory diseases: transient tachypnea of the neonate (TTN), respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), pneumothorax (PNX), pleural effusion (PE), or pneumonia. Finally, we mention two functional approaches to lung ultrasound: The use of lung ultrasound in level I delivery centers as a mean to assess the severity of neonatal respiratory distress and request a transport to a higher degree structure in a timely fashion. The prognostic accuracy of lung ultrasound for early and targeted surfactant replacement. Conclusion: LU is still a useful tool in level I/II neonatal units, both for diagnostic and functional issues. (Table presented.)
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85184168284&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-05375-5; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38315204; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00431-023-05375-5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-05375-5; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00431-023-05375-5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know