The appearance of Tregs in cancer nest is a promising independent risk factor in colon cancer
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, ISSN: 1432-1335, Vol: 139, Issue: 11, Page: 1845-1852
2013
- 23Citations
- 29Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations23
- Citation Indexes23
- 23
- CrossRef22
- Captures29
- Readers29
- 29
Article Description
Purpose To investigate the prognostic value of tumorinfiltrating regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the distribution of cancer nest, cancer stroma and normal mucosa and FOXP3-positive cancer cells in colon cancer patients after resection. Methods Paraffin blocks of operation resection of primary adenocarcinoma of colon were obtained from ninety patients. The distribution of tumor-infiltrating Tregs was detected by tissue microarray and immunohistochemistry staining technique to evaluate the prognostic effects by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis using median values as cutoff. Results The intratumoral Tregs counts were significantly higher than that in corresponding normal mucosa tissues (P\0.001); the Tregs counts in cancer nest were significantly lower than that in corresponding cancer stroma tissues (P\0.001); the increased intratumoral Tregs counts were associated with favorable prognosis (P\0.05); the presence of Tregs in cancer nest was associated with unfavorable prognosis and was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P\0.05). The appearance of FOXP3-positive cancer cells was associated with worse prognosis (P\0.05). In addition, the frequency of the presence of FOXP3-positive cancer cells was higher in patients with lymphatic invasion (P\0.001) and lower in patients with early TNM stage (P\0.01). Conclusions The higher tumor-infiltrating Tregs counts are closely associated with the improved prognostic effects of colon carcinoma. Tregs play different roles in cancer nest and cancer stroma. And the appearance of Tregs in cancer nest is a promising independent risk factor for overall survival in colon carcinoma. FOXP3-positive cancer cells may also be a risk factor for overall survival in colon carcinoma. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84892645900&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-013-1500-7; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24005418; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00432-013-1500-7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-013-1500-7; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00432-013-1500-7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know