SALL4 as a new biomarker for early colorectal cancers
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, ISSN: 1432-1335, Vol: 141, Issue: 2, Page: 229-235
2015
- 65Citations
- 38Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations65
- Citation Indexes65
- 65
- CrossRef37
- Captures38
- Readers38
- 38
Article Description
Methods: Peripheral mononuclear cells from 111 cases were examined using absolute quantitative real-time RT-PCR to assess the exact copy number of SALL4 and CEA mRNA. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were also depicted to detect the sensitivity and specificity of SALL4 mRNA. Results: The blood copy number of SALL4 in recruited CRC patients was significantly higher than healthy controls (p = 0.0001). This high copy number was not only inversely associated with the depth of tumor invasion (p = 0.045), but also was significantly correlated with the high grade of tumor differentiation (p = 0.029) and sex (p = 0.027). Furthermore, the copy number of SALL4 was elevated in all examined serum samples (p = 0.0001) in significant association with high grade of tumor differentiation (p = 0.026) and patients’ age (p = 0.012). ROC analysis indicated 96.1 and 95 % sensitivity and specificity of SALL4 for CRC screening, respectively. Conclusion: Early detection of CRC is directly correlated to improved outcomes, increased survival rates and reduced mortality. Our results can introduce SALL4 as a critical biomarker for efficient screening of patients to detect early stages of CRC. Purpose: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death worldwide, and there is an urgent need to identify critical diagnostic and prognostic factors for early detection of the disease. Our aim in this study was to elucidate absolute copy number of SALL4 mRNA in the peripheral blood and serum of CRC patients to evaluate its probable prognostic or diagnostic value for CRC.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84921065390&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-014-1808-y; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25156818; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00432-014-1808-y; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-014-1808-y; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00432-014-1808-y
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know