Prognostic stratification of patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma using a clinical and biochemical scoring system
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, ISSN: 1432-1335, Vol: 143, Issue: 12, Page: 2563-2570
2017
- 13Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations13
- Citation Indexes13
- 13
- Captures19
- Readers19
- 19
Article Description
Purpose Metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is known to have poor survival outcomes. Clinical and biochemical parameters may impact survival outcomes among patients with metastatic NPC and may be used for prognostication. Methods One-hundred and fifty-eight patients with metastatic NPC treated at a single tertiary institution were analyzed retrospectively. Multivariate analysis was carried out on patients who were given disease control treatment (n = 135). A numerical score derived from the regression coefficients of each identified independent variable was used to create prognostic groups (PG). A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results Independent negative prognostic factors included ECOG status >1, LDH level >580 U/L, hemoglobin level <12.0 g/dL and having more than one metastatic organ involvement. Three PGs were obtained: low risk (total score = 0), intermediate risk (1–2) and high risk (3–4). Median survivals of the 3 groups (low, intermediate and high risk) were 57.1, 18.1 and 8.0 months for the three different risk groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion Risk stratification of patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer is possible using a prognostic scoring system based on clinical and biochemical parameters. Patients with low-risk score may achieve good metastatic survival and may benefit from additional therapy for disease control.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85028563692&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-017-2496-1; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28849413; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00432-017-2496-1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-017-2496-1; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00432-017-2496-1
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know