Establishment and validation of a competitive risk model for predicting cancer-specific survival in patients with osteosarcoma: a population-based study
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, ISSN: 1432-1335, Vol: 149, Issue: 17, Page: 15383-15394
2023
- 2Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Background: Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone tumor with a poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to establish a competitive risk model nomogram to predict cancer-specific survival in patients with osteosarcoma. Methods: Patient data was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database in the United States. A sub-distribution proportional hazards model was used to analyze independent risk factors affecting cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in osteosarcoma patients. Based on these risk factors, a competitive risk model was constructed to predict 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) in osteosarcoma patients. The reliability and accuracy of the nomogram were evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and calibration curves. Results: A total of 2900 osteosarcoma patients were included. The analysis showed that age, primary tumor site, M stage, surgery, chemotherapy, and median household income were independent risk factors influencing CSM in patients. The competitive risk model was constructed to predict CSS in osteosarcoma patients. In the training and validation sets, the C-index of the model was 0.756 (95% CI 0.725–0.787) and 0.737 (95% CI 0.717–0.757), respectively, and the AUC was greater than 0.7 for both. The calibration curves also demonstrated a high consistency between the predicted survival rates and the actual survival rates, confirming the accuracy and reliability of the model. Conclusion: We established a competitive risk model to predict 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year CSS in osteosarcoma patients. The model demonstrated good predictive performance and can assist clinicians and patients in making clinical decisions and formulating follow-up strategies.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85168856512&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05320-x; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37639006; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00432-023-05320-x; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05320-x; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00432-023-05320-x
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know