Temperature as a control over ecosystem co fluxes in a high-elevation, subalpine forest
Oecologia, ISSN: 0029-8549, Vol: 134, Issue: 4, Page: 537-546
2003
- 139Citations
- 140Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations139
- Citation Indexes139
- 139
- CrossRef118
- Captures140
- Readers140
- 140
Article Description
We evaluated the hypothesis that CO uptake by a subalpine, coniferous forest is limited by cool temperature during the growing season. Using the eddy covariance approach we conducted observations of net ecosystem CO exchange (NEE) across two growing seasons. When pooled for the entire growing season during both years, light-saturated net ecosystem CO exchange (NEE) exhibited a temperature optimum within the range 7-12°C. Ecosystem respiration rate (R), calculated as the y-intercept of the NEE versus photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) relationship, increased with increasing temperature, causing a 15% reduction in net CO uptake capacity for this ecosystem as temperatures increased from typical early season temperatures of 7°C to typical mid-season temperatures of 18°C. The ecosystem quantum yield and the ecosystem PPFD compensation point, which are measures of light-utilization efficiency, were highest during the cool temperatures of the early season, and decreased later in the season at higher temperatures. Branch-level measurements revealed that net photosynthesis in all three of the dominant conifer tree species exhibited a temperature optimum near 10°C early in the season and 15°C later in the season. Using path analysis, we statistically isolated temperature as a seasonal variable, and identified the dynamic role that temperature exhibits in controlling ecosystem fluxes early and late in the season. During the spring, an increase in temperature has a positive effect on NEE, because daytime temperatures progress from near freezing to near the photosynthetic temperature optimum, and R values remain low. During the middle of the summer an increase in temperature has a negative effect on NEE, because inhibition of net photosynthesis and increases in R. When taken together, the results demonstrate that in this high-elevation forest ecosystem CO uptake is not limited by cool-temperature constraints on photosynthetic processes during the growing-season, as suggested by some previous ecophysiological studies at the branch and needle levels. Rather, it is warm temperatures in the midsummer, and their effect on ecosystem respiration, that cause the greatest reduction in the potential for forest carbon sequestration.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0037335388&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-1131-1; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12647126; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00442-002-1131-1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-1131-1; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00442-002-1131-1
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know