A statistical method for determining the volume of volcanic fall deposits
Bulletin of Volcanology, ISSN: 1432-0819, Vol: 75, Issue: 6, Page: 1-10
2013
- 37Citations
- 58Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Volumes of tephra-fall deposits are difficult to determine due to the commonly poor preservation of proximal and distal areas of the deposit. Typically, these volumes are found by extrapolating thinning trends found from isopach maps drawn for the areas of the deposits that are preserved. However, the construction of isopach contours is dependent on subjective interpretation of field measurements and can be highly variable. Here, we have investigated the spatial correlation relationships of thickness measurements from fall deposits to the vent location to produce a purely statistical method to objectively determine the volume of a fall deposit without the production of isopach maps. Integration of a log linear regression model for thickness measurements with distance from the vent is applied to the field measurements without any prior interpretation, and data and model uncertainty has been accounted for using Bayesian methods. Eruption volumes calculated from our method correspond well to those previously determined by alternative approaches for the deposits of Fogo A, Azores; Askja 1875, Iceland; Santa Maria 1902, Guatemala; and Pinatubo 1991, Philippines. The quantification of uncertainty in field measurements and model error, and the removal of subjectivity incurred in the production of isopach maps suggest that the method presented here can offer benefits in determining the volumes of deposits. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84877756131&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00445-013-0707-4; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00445-013-0707-4; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00445-013-0707-4; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00445-013-0707-4.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00445-013-0707-4/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00445-013-0707-4; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00445-013-0707-4
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know