Process performance of parallel bioreactors for batch cultivation of Streptomyces tendae
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, ISSN: 1615-7591, Vol: 34, Issue: 3, Page: 297-304
2011
- 12Citations
- 39Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- 12
- CrossRef11
- Captures39
- Readers39
- 39
Article Description
Batch cultivations of the nikkomycin Z producer Streptomyces tendae were performed in three different parallel bioreactor systems (milliliter-scale stirred-tank reactors, shake flasks and shaken microtiter plate) in comparison to a standard liter-scale stirred-tank reactor as reference. Similar dry cell weight concentrations were measured as function of process time in stirred-tank reactors and shake flasks, whereas only poor growth was observed in the shaken microtiter plate. In contrast, the nikkomycin Z production differed significantly between the stirred and shaken bioreactors. The measured product concentrations and product formation kinetics were almost the same in the stirred-tank bioreactors of different scale. Much less nikkomycin Z was formed in the shake flasks and MTP cultivations, most probably due to oxygen limitations. To investigate the non-Newtonian shear-thinning behavior of the culture broth in small-scale bioreactors, a new and simple method was applied to estimate the rheological behavior. The apparent viscosities were found to be very similar in the stirred-tank bioreactors, whereas the apparent viscosity was up to two times increased in the shake flask cultivations due to a lower average shear rate of this reactor system. These data illustrate that different engineering characteristics of parallel bioreactors applied for process development can have major implications for scale-up of bioprocesses with non-Newtonian viscous culture broths. © Springer-Verlag 2010.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79955933278&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00449-010-0471-1; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20931236; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00449-010-0471-1; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00449-010-0471-1; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00449-010-0471-1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00449-010-0471-1; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00449-010-0471-1
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know