Biliary stenting is not a prerequisite to endoscopic placement of duodenal covered self-expandable metal stents
Surgical Endoscopy, ISSN: 1432-2218, Vol: 30, Issue: 2, Page: 437-445
2016
- 9Citations
- 39Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef9
- Captures39
- Readers39
- 39
Article Description
Background: Duodenal covered self-expandable metal stent (cSEMS) can be used in malignant or benign gastroduodenal obstruction. The need for biliary stenting in patients with no concomitant biliary stricture, before duodenal cSEMS placement, remains unknown. The aim of this study was to determine whether cSEMS placement is responsible for biliary obstruction. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective, case-controlled study, including 106 patients with symptomatic gastric outlet obstruction or duodenal fistula who received a covered nitinol duodenal stent by using through-the-scope/over-the-wire placement procedure. The main outcome measurement was the occurrence comparison of jaundice and bilirubin level, between patients with previous or concomitant biliary stenting (cSEMS + BS group), and patients with no biliary stent (cSEMS group) during an observational period of 90 days. Results: Hundred and six patients underwent cSEMS placement between June 2005 and March 2014: 53 in the cSEMS group (58 % male, mean age 66.4 ± 13.3 years) and 53 in cSEMS + BS group (60 % male, mean age 70.4 ± 11.6 years). The obstruction was due to cancer in 45 % in cSEMS group and 87 % in cSEMS + BS group. No case of jaundice was reported in the cSEMS group or in the cSEMS + BS group. In cSEMS group, the mean bilirubin level (μmol/L ± SD) was 8.0 ± 4 at baseline and 8.5 ± 4.6 at day 10, while in the cSEMS + BS group it was 91.4 ± 108 at baseline and 35.3 ± 39 at day 10 (p < 0.01). Patients from the two groups were matched on age, gender and bilirubin level at baseline. Evolution of bilirubinemia was +0.98 ± 2.76 µmol/L in experimental group and +0.39 ± 522 µmol/L in the control group (p = 0.34). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in term of technical success, clinical effectiveness, migration and other complications. Conclusions: Previous biliary stenting is not required before endoscopic covered duodenal stent placement in patients with no associated biliary obstruction. Prospective studies are needed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84957841880&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4216-8; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25894447; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-015-4216-8; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4216-8; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00464-015-4216-8; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-015-4216-8.pdf; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs00464-015-4216-8.pdf; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-015-4216-8; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00464-015-4216-8/fulltext.html; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00464-015-4216-8
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know