Anterior approach for pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy
Surgical Endoscopy, ISSN: 1432-2218, Vol: 34, Issue: 10, Page: 4677-4678
2020
- 6Citations
- 18Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations6
- Citation Indexes6
- CrossRef5
- Captures18
- Readers18
- 18
Article Description
Background: Pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (PLDH) is being increasingly performed at centers with experienced surgeons [1–6]. This procedure is still developing and is associated with several challenges owing to its technical difficulty [7–9]. Conversely, the anterior approach is sometimes applied to both laparoscopic and open right hepatectomy for management of tumors in the liver [10, 11]. However, there are no reports regarding the use of the anterior approach for PLDH. We found this method to be useful; therefore, we aimed to introduce the novel procedure using a video clip. Methods: The donor was placed in the supine position. First, the right side of the inferior vena cava was dissected instead of performing the liver hanging maneuver. The right Glissonean pedicle was encircled and controlled, and the liver parenchyma was completely transected. Thereafter, the ligaments around the liver were dissected, and the graft was mobilized. The hilar vessels were respectively separated. Finally, the right hepatic duct, right hepatic artery, right portal vein, and right hepatic vein were divided, and the graft liver was retrieved. This study was approved by institutional ethics board (MH2019-119), and informed consent was taken from the patient. Results: The overall surgical time was 400 min, the volume of blood loss was 31 mL, the warm ischemic time was 7 min, and no complications were seen. Conclusion: The advantages of the anterior approach for right-sided PLDH might be attribute to reduction of compression injury and incidence of subcapsular hematoma, as liver mobilization is easily performed because of increased liver mobility. However, PLDH is a highly-skilled procedure, and indications for PLDH should be extended in a step-wise manner. Further, the procedure should be performed only by highly proficient surgeons having extensive experience in both laparoscopic liver resection and living donor liver transplantation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086082752&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07649-7; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32519272; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-020-07649-7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07649-7; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00464-020-07649-7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know