Feature importance measures for hydrological applications: insights from a virtual experiment
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, ISSN: 1436-3259, Vol: 37, Issue: 12, Page: 4921-4939
2023
- 8Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Discriminating the role of input variables in a hydrological system or in a multivariate hydrological study is particularly useful. Nowadays, emerging tools, called feature importance measures, are increasingly being applied in hydrological applications. In this study, we propose a virtual experiment to fully understand the functionality and, most importantly, the usefulness of these measures. Thirteen importance measures related to four general classes of methods are quantitatively evaluated to reproduce a benchmark importance ranking. This benchmark ranking is designed using a linear combination of ten random variables. Synthetic time series with varying distribution, cross-correlation, autocorrelation and random noise are simulated to mimic hydrological scenarios. The obtained results clearly suggest that a subgroup of three feature importance measures (Shapley-based feature importance, derivative-based measure, and permutation feature importance) generally provide reliable rankings and outperform the remaining importance measures, making them preferable in hydrological applications.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know