Support of opioid rotation using online apps: Evaluation of applicability and comparison to the LONTS guidelines
Schmerz, ISSN: 1432-2129, Vol: 37, Issue: 4, Page: 290-296
2023
- 2Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Background: Opioid rotation can be indicated due to drug side effects, drug interactions or inadequate effect of treatment with opioids. For the determination of the oral morphine equivalence, a practice tool has been published with the long-term use of opioids in chronic nontumor-related pain (LONTS) guidelines. In contrast, several apps are available that have not yet been evaluated. Material and methods: Apps and web applications for opioid conversion were searched using Google Play Store®, iOS App Store® and the Google® search engine. German and English language apps with calculator functions were included. Using the apps, 16 test cases from clinical practice were calculated and the deviation from the recommendation of the LONTS guidelines was calculated. Results: A total of 17 apps were identified, 11 named the origin of the algorithm and 3 of them defined the literature sources. None of the apps and web applications had a quality seal, and none could solve all cases. Deviations of the resulting oral morphine equivalents of up to 179% from the guideline-compliant conversion were identified and 4 apps warned for overdosing. Conclusion: Although the apps and web applications simplify conversion between opioids, there is high variance in conversion factors and sometimes a relevant deviation from evidence-based tables. Overall, there is a high risk of false opioid dosing.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85143771031&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00482-022-00683-5; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36508032; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00482-022-00683-5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00482-022-00683-5; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00482-022-00683-5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know