An intelligent approach for estimating aeration efficiency in stepped cascades: optimized support vector regression models and mutual information theory
Soft Computing, ISSN: 1433-7479, Vol: 26, Issue: 24, Page: 13969-13984
2022
- 3Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Soft computing (SC) methods have increasingly been used to solve complex hydraulic engineering problems, especially those characterized by high uncertainty. SC approaches have previously proved to be an accurate tool for predicting the aeration efficiency coefficient (E20) in hydraulic structures such as weirs and flumes. In this study, the performance of the standalone support vector regression (SVR) algorithm and three of its hybrid versions, support vector regression–firefly algorithm (SVR-FA), support vector regression–grasshopper optimization algorithm (SVR-GOA), and support vector regression–artificial bee colony (SVR-ABC), is assessed for the prediction of E20 in stepped cascades. Mutual information theory is used to construct input variable combinations for prediction, including the parameters unit discharge (q), the total number of steps (N), step height (h), chute overall length (L), and chute inclination (α). Entropy indicators, such as maximum likelihood, Jeffrey, Laplace, Schurmann–Grassberger, and minimax, are computed to quantify the epistemic uncertainty associated with the models. Four indices—correlation coefficient (R), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE)—are employed for evaluating the models’ prediction performance. The models’ outputs reveal that the SVR-FA model (with R=0.947,NSE=0.888,RMSE=0.048andMAE=0.027 in testing phase) has the best performance among all the models considered. The input variable combination, including q, N, h, and L, provides the best predictions with the SVR, SVR-FA, and SVR-GOA models. From the uncertainty analysis, the SVR-FA model shows the closest entropy values to the observed ones (3.630 vs. 3.628 for the “classic” entropy method and 3.647 vs. 3.643 on average for the Bayesian entropy method). This study proves that SC algorithms can be highly accurate in simulating aeration efficiency in stepped cascades and provide a valid alternative to the traditional empirical equation.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know