Evolutionary framework for coding area selection from cancer data
Neural Computing and Applications, ISSN: 0941-0643, Vol: 29, Issue: 4, Page: 1015-1037
2018
- 20Citations
- 34Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Cancer data analysis is significant to detect the codes that are responsible for cancer diseases. It is significant to find out the coding regions from diseases infected biological data. The infected data will be helpful to design proper drugs and will be supportable in laboratory assessments. Codes bear specific meaning on various features as well as symptoms of diseases. Coding of biological data is a key area to get exact information on animals to discover the desired medicine. In the current work, four different machine learning approaches such as support vector machine (SVM), principal component analysis (PCA) technique, neural mapping skyline filtering (NMSF) and Fisher’s discriminant analysis (FDA) were applied for data reduction and coding area selection. The experimental analysis established that the SVM outperforms PCA and FDA. However, due to the mapping facility, NMSF outperforms SVM. Thus, the NMSF achieved the preeminent results among the four techniques. Matthews’s correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, F-measures and error rate of the four methods that are used to determine the coding area. Detailed experimental analysis included comparison study among the four classifiers for the deoxyribonucleic acid dataset.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84982840469&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2513-3; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00521-016-2513-3; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00521-016-2513-3; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00521-016-2513-3.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00521-016-2513-3/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2513-3; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00521-016-2513-3
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know