Drain management after pancreatic resection: State of the art
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences, ISSN: 1868-6974, Vol: 18, Issue: 6, Page: 779-784
2011
- 24Citations
- 35Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations24
- Citation Indexes21
- 21
- CrossRef19
- Policy Citations3
- 3
- Captures35
- Readers35
- 35
Article Description
Background: Placement of intraperitoneal drain (ID) after abdominal surgery is a common practice. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), incidence of which ranges from 2% to more than 30%, represents the most common major complication after pancreatic resection. The goal of this paper is to review the state of the art in ID management after pancreatic resection. Methods: Data from randomized controlled trials (RCT) are reported together with data from our institution in the period before and after the start of the two reported RCTs. Results: One thousand five hundred eighty patients underwent surgical resection for pancreatic lesions at our institution from 1990 to 2010. The overall rate of POPF was 23% before and 19.5% after (P = 0.24) the performance of the RCTs. Both postoperative morbidity and average in-hospital stay were higher in the period before the RCTs (13.6 ± 11.4 versus 13.4 ± 10.3 days, respectively). Conclusions: POPF is a complex and multifactorial complication after pancreatic surgery. On the basis of the present results and review of the RCTs, the value of ID and its management after pancreatic surgery remain unclear. © 2011 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Springer.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80255127367&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00534-011-0431-4; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21861143; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1007/s00534-011-0431-4; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00534-011-0431-4; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00534-011-0431-4; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00534-011-0431-4; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00534-011-0431-4; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1007/s00534-011-0431-4
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know