Helicobacter pylori status and esophagogastroduodenal mucosal lesions in patients with end-stage renal failure on maintenance hemodialysis
Journal of Gastroenterology, ISSN: 0944-1174, Vol: 45, Issue: 5, Page: 515-522
2010
- 10Citations
- 33Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef4
- Captures33
- Readers33
- 33
Article Description
Objectives: The aim of this study was to elucidate the impact of Helicobacter pylori infection on esophagogastroduodenal mucosal lesions in patients with end-stage renal failure on maintenance hemodialysis (HD). Methods: An upper endoscopy and the C-urea breath test were performed in 198 patients on maintenance HD. Clinical features, serum pepsinogen levels and esophagogastroduodenal mucosal lesions were compared between H. pylori-positive and H. pylori-negative patients. Risk factors associated with esophagogastroduodenal mucosal lesion were determined by multivariate analyses. Results: The upper endoscopy revealed that gastric erosion was the most frequent (58%) type of esophagogastroduodenal mucosal lesion, followed by duodenal erosion (18%), gastric ulcer (14%), gastroesophageal reflux disease (10%), and duodenal ulcer (7%). Of the 198 patients enrolled in the study, 81 were positive and 117 patients were negative for H. pylori infection. The time duration after the introduction of HD was significantly longer and serum pepsinogen I/II ratio was significantly higher in H. pylori-negative patients than in H. pylori-positive patients. Multivariate analyses revealed that the H. pylori infection was an independent, protective factor for gastric erosion (odds ratio 0.38; 95% confidence interval 0.21-0.70), while the infection was unrelated to other mucosal lesions. Conclusions: The most common mucosal lesion observed in our study cohort, all of whom were patients on maintenance HD, was gastric erosion. The high prevalence of this type of lesion may be explained partly by the cure of H. pylori infection during the clinical course of maintenance HD. © 2010 Springer.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77953325213&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-009-0196-6; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20084526; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00535-009-0196-6; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-009-0196-6; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00535-009-0196-6; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00535-009-0196-6; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00535-009-0196-6
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know