Regarding loads after spinal fusion, every level should be seen separately: a musculoskeletal analysis
European Spine Journal, ISSN: 1432-0932, Vol: 27, Issue: 8, Page: 1905-1910
2018
- 11Citations
- 37Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations11
- Citation Indexes11
- 11
- Captures37
- Readers37
- 37
Article Description
Introduction: The number of spinal fusion surgeries is steadily increasing and biomechanical consequences are still in debate. The aim of this study is to provide biomechanical insights into the sagittal balance of the spine and to compare spinal load before and after spinal fusion. Method: The joint reaction forces of 52 patients were analyzed in proximo-distal and antero-posterior direction from the levels T12–L1 to L5–S1 using musculoskeletal simulations. Results: In 104 simulations, pre-surgical forces were equal to post-surgical. The levels L4–L5 and T12–L1, however, showed increased spinal forces compression forces with higher sagittal displacement. Improved restauration of sagittal balance was accompanied by lower spinal load. AP shear stress, interestingly decreased with sagittal imbalance. Conclusion: Imbalanced spines have a risk of increased compression forces at Th12–L1. L4–L5 always has increased spinal loads. Graphical abstract: These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.[Figure not available: see fulltext.].
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85040704550&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5476-5; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29352353; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00586-018-5476-5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5476-5; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00586-018-5476-5
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know